<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Logo Do You Like Best?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/</link>
	<description>Engaging imagination.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:55:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Piper</title>
		<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>James Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rareformfilms.com/?p=267#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I like #2, but I think that i like the color of &quot;rare&quot; from line #1, and like the color in form from Line #3. I do like the font in #2, but think the color needs to stand out more against the black, or whatever background you chose to put it against.  I do think the font looks good as is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like #2, but I think that i like the color of &#8220;rare&#8221; from line #1, and like the color in form from Line #3. I do like the font in #2, but think the color needs to stand out more against the black, or whatever background you chose to put it against.  I do think the font looks good as is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Wiebalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Wiebalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rareformfilms.com/?p=267#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I agree with most everyone on Logo #2.  It&#039;s a matter of switching small aspects on the winning one so you can fine tune it.  Try switching cases in first/last words and beefing up the bevel/emboss on one or the other, etc.

@KellyCo Thanks for the reminder to check with light background.  Since this site is darker I guess it makes sense to create two logo versions total.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most everyone on Logo #2.  It&#8217;s a matter of switching small aspects on the winning one so you can fine tune it.  Try switching cases in first/last words and beefing up the bevel/emboss on one or the other, etc.</p>
<p>@KellyCo Thanks for the reminder to check with light background.  Since this site is darker I guess it makes sense to create two logo versions total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rareform</title>
		<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>rareform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rareformfilms.com/?p=267#comment-10</guid>
		<description>@Josh We&#039;re still in the process of &quot;dirtying&quot; up our website.  Even a grunge texture overlaid on the background will make a difference.  We&#039;re trying to set our core branding first, then apply it to all of the marketing/digital materials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh We&#8217;re still in the process of &#8220;dirtying&#8221; up our website.  Even a grunge texture overlaid on the background will make a difference.  We&#8217;re trying to set our core branding first, then apply it to all of the marketing/digital materials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KellyCo</title>
		<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>KellyCo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rareformfilms.com/?p=267#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I like #2 the best because of the contrast. I think the upper case R and F have the best readability.

Make sure you do another set suitable for a white background for letterhead, and other print items!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like #2 the best because of the contrast. I think the upper case R and F have the best readability.</p>
<p>Make sure you do another set suitable for a white background for letterhead, and other print items!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rareformfilms.com/?p=267#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Kerning seems off on the letters, and why pick a grunge font for the logo while going for a clean look on the website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerning seems off on the letters, and why pick a grunge font for the logo while going for a clean look on the website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmw smartdog</title>
		<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>bmw smartdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rareformfilms.com/?p=267#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I like # 2 best, but #2 still needs work.  I don&#039;t think that I like the font of the second half of the word.  It looks like the printer is running out of ink.

The word &quot;rare&quot; is hard to read in #1 (too dark), and #3 again, looks like the printer is running out of ink.

In my opinion, the connotation of &quot;rareform&quot; is excellence.  If the logo looks like ink is missing, this is not in rare form.

Try experimenting with #2 by putting the first &quot;r&quot; in lower case, and leave the &quot;f&quot; in upper case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like # 2 best, but #2 still needs work.  I don&#8217;t think that I like the font of the second half of the word.  It looks like the printer is running out of ink.</p>
<p>The word &#8220;rare&#8221; is hard to read in #1 (too dark), and #3 again, looks like the printer is running out of ink.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the connotation of &#8220;rareform&#8221; is excellence.  If the logo looks like ink is missing, this is not in rare form.</p>
<p>Try experimenting with #2 by putting the first &#8220;r&#8221; in lower case, and leave the &#8220;f&#8221; in upper case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rareformfilms.com/?p=267#comment-6</guid>
		<description>On my laptop monitor, &quot;Rare&quot; in Logo 1 blends into the background.  I prefer the look of Logo 3, but the color ain&#039;t doin&#039; it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my laptop monitor, &#8220;Rare&#8221; in Logo 1 blends into the background.  I prefer the look of Logo 3, but the color ain&#8217;t doin&#8217; it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.rareformfilms.com/2009/01/which-logo-do-you-like-best/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rareformfilms.com/?p=267#comment-5</guid>
		<description>i agree with #2 but think the &quot;f&quot; should be lower case (?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with #2 but think the &#8220;f&#8221; should be lower case (?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
